[Expertfinder-dev] ExpertFinder: Related Ontologies document

[Axel Polleres]

p.s.: any other volunteers who add themselves to the author's lists are 
of course welcome, but I suggest the named ones to take over main 
editing for the moment!

p.p.s.:
Document (iii) could then also include the as we decided in the last 
TeleConf on Requirements (for personal, institutional, events and 
projects, homepages) and coverage (what do we want to cover), i.e. this 
would be ONE document.

p.p.p.s.: Next Teleconf, this thursday, spearate reminder will be sent 
out! ;-)

Axel Polleres wrote:
> A.Zhdanova at surrey.ac.uk wrote:
> 
>> Hello Axel, Uldis,
>>
>> Is there a special "related work" page for ExpertFinder?
> 
> 
> not yet, but we should restructure this, see below!
> 
>> I have added a few links to
>> http://www.rdfweb.org/topic/ExpertFinder_2fExtendedRDF
>>
>> In fact, for the related work, we could distinguish at least between the
>> work on (i) vocabularies, (ii) enabling technologies and use cases,
>> (iii) generally relevant projects and initiatives. For example, Axel's
>> page on SIOC-related ontologies focuses on the first type of items,
>> i.e., vocabularies.
>>
>> If we at some stage want to elaborate this initiative in a project
>> proposal, I think such a differentiation would be useful.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Anna
> 
> 
> As a first step, I suggest a domcument focusing on (i), andthis is what 
> we plan to focus on for the moment/
> I asked a student here to work out something similar to what I did for 
> SIOC.
>  Otherwise, I like the proposed structure, but would keep it on separate 
> Wiki pages accessible from one common root. What if you, Anna, focus on 
> ii and iii?
> 
> There is already material on the current pages, e.g.the best practices 
> page also has a lot of links:
>    http://www.rdfweb.org/topic/ExpertFinder_2fBestPractices
> which Stijn  already suggested to merge rather into the
>   http://www.rdfweb.org/topic/ExpertFinder_2fExtendedRDF
> page. But since this mixes projects and ontologies, and I like your 
> structure, I suggest the following 3 NEW documents, linked from the
> current wiki as subpages and cleaning up what is there for the moment:
> 
> 
> 1) A document "Related Ontologies/Vocabularies" (i) (we work on that), 
> linked from:
>    http://www.rdfweb.org/topic/ExpertFinder_2fExtendedRDF
> 
>  Authors: Juan Luis+Axel, (Uldis?)
> 
> 2) A document "Enabling technologies" (ii) linked from
> http://www.rdfweb.org/topic/ExpertFinder_2fRules
> via a link "Other enabling technologies", we can decide later on, 
> whether we want to restructure the whole part in order to give other 
> enabling techs the same position as rules, then we shall also change the 
> top page, but these shall IMO remain the main focus at the moment and we 
> shall decide upon what to add in the group.
> 
>  Author: Anna
> 
> 3) A document "Related projects and initiatives" (iii) which for the 
> moment collects and removes all the links distributed over several 
> places now in the wiki with a short explanation for each, linked from:
>  http://www.rdfweb.org/topic/ExpertFinder_2fBestPractices
> 
>  Author: Stijn
> 
> Does this sound feasible to you?
> 
> Axel
> 
> 


-- 
Dr. Axel Polleres
email: axel at polleres.net  url: http://www.polleres.net/