[rdfweb-dev] RDF Signing (was: IM URIs)
iand at internetalchemy.org
Sat Aug 2 16:18:48 UTC 2003
On Saturday, 02 August 2003 at 12:05, Dan Brickley wrote:
> * Bill Kearney <wkearney99 at hotmail.com> [2003-08-02 06:20-0400]
> [handy explanation snipped]
>> What I'm *really* sensing here is we need some reliable universal way to swap
>> data publicly that's been hashed or otherwise obfuscated that allows our
>> software to untangle all this. As in, use a group resource of some kind that
>> understands the private hashes and helps act as an intermediary between you and
>> the resource to with you want to connect. A server that, when you give it a
>> hash and it authenticates you, can either tell you the real address or sends
>> some sort of notification to the intended recipient that expresses your
>> The question then becomes is how to do we effectively markup that we're using
>> hashed values and those values can be resolved via a 'known' mechanism of some
> My hunch is that it is probably time to take a more careful look at
> the XML Encryption and XML Signature work,
> While a few of us have been looking at the use of PGP to sign or encrypt
> entire RDF/XML documents (FOAFbot notably supporting signatures), the
> use of XML Enryption promises a more fine-grained facility. If I understand
> correctly, it would give us a way of having chunks of signed or
> encrypted data as markup within a larger RDF/XML document. It's a while since
> I looked at those specs.
Given the flexibility of RDF representation wouldn't the best way to
sign RDF be to sign the resultant triples? You can then certify what
you are saying regardless of how you are saying it.
You'd need to choose a canonical form (N-Triples) with a convention
for labelling blank nodes and ordering the triples (alphabetical would
do?) and sign the result.
-- Ian <iand at internetalchemy.org>
"One never notices what has been done; one can only see what remains to be done."
More information about the foaf-dev