[rdfweb-dev] telephone as inverseFunctionalProperty ?
pldms at mac.com
Thu Aug 7 12:03:10 UTC 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Jim Ley <jim at jibbering.com> writes:
> I concede the point though, it may be too far currently (we have the same
> problem with mbox though, many people share mbox's) Maybe we can have
> foaf:mobileTelNo which is an IFP?
How about directTelNo instead? For a number which goes direct to the
person. Should cover the mobile case and direct-to-desk numbers. That
can be an IFP. And (like mboxes) if you share the phone then claiming
it's a directTelNo is false.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Darwin)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 and Gnu Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org/>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the foaf-dev