[rdfweb-dev] telephone as inverseFunctionalProperty ?

Damian Steer pldms at mac.com
Thu Aug 7 12:03:10 UTC 2003


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jim Ley <jim at jibbering.com> writes:

> I concede the point though, it may be too far currently (we have the same
> problem with mbox though, many people share mbox's)  Maybe we can have
> foaf:mobileTelNo which is an IFP?

How about directTelNo instead? For a number which goes direct to the
person. Should cover the mobile case and direct-to-desk numbers. That
can be an IFP. And (like mboxes) if you share the phone then claiming
it's a directTelNo is false.

Damian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Darwin)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 and Gnu Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org/>

iD8DBQE/Mj/9AyLCB+mTtykRAvx/AJ9SYQSJu34oTRDEfBbADRpGLQX3lwCfXz2Z
7UQUzTZOE6OgEfwwj75W3F0=
=1d18
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the foaf-dev mailing list