[rdfweb-dev] advocating use of
jim at jibbering.com
Mon Aug 18 15:33:36 UTC 2003
"Bill Kearney" <wkearney99 at hotmail.com>
> I'm not arguing that one is better than the other. I'm suggesting that
> arguments against URI durability are weak, at best.
The argument is not against durability, but against the failure scenario
when the URI fails, it leaves all other documents pointing at a different
Person, foaf:mbox or foaf:mbox_sha1sum do not suffer that problem, as they
are defined in such a way as to make that impossible, if you can define the
URI in the same way I'd be interested, (although still wouldn't be willing
to give myself one) but I don't see how you can with http:// at least.
More information about the foaf-dev