[rdfweb-dev] Re: FOAF Schema Validation
julian_bond at v...
Wed Jan 22 08:30:37 UTC 2003
Jim Ley <jim at j...> wrote:
>> BTW. Could someone point me at a description of what "Range" and
>> "Domain" mean?
>but none to clear...
Yup that's as clear as mud.
I read http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/ that Domain said that the Property
must be a sub element of the Domain. And that Range meant that the
Property *may* contain a sub element of Range.
So looking at img.
was valid and so was
But then people have coded up
Which looks wrong to me. Preferring
ISTM it would be useful for FOAF to follow both RDF and XML rules. An
agreed syntax would provide clearer guidance to authors and allow an XML
interpretation of the data without preventing the community from reading
it as RDF and extending it as RDF as required.
Still puzzles me that
<mbox rdf:resource="some at e...">
<mbox_sha1sum>some at e... SHA1</mbox_sha1sum>
Julian Bond Email&MSM: julian.bond at v...
Personal WebLog: http://www.voidstar.com/
M: +44 (0)77 5907 2173 T: +44 (0)192 0412 433
More information about the foaf-dev