[rdfweb-dev] Nicks needed to support anonymity
mof-rdf at mfd-consult.dk
Sat Jul 26 17:31:05 UTC 2003
On Saturday 26 July 2003 18:46, Karl Dubost wrote:
> The more I think about the name issue, the more I think there is only
> one way to be universal.
> IMHO, There should be only an element name.
> The benefit is that it simplifies foaf and it let the doors open to
> import a vocabulary coming from an ontology on names.
I agree completely, FoaF shouldn't need to be a definitive ontology of names,
also because it's very complicated - as I have found out the hard way...
More information about the foaf-dev