[rdfweb-dev] Suggestion about FOAF vacabulary

Joe 10 joe at joe10.com
Fri May 2 22:18:33 UTC 2003

At 12:56 PM +0100 5/2/03, Libby Miller wrote:
>You're right about people having several email addresses (and several
>people having the same address, although that possibility is ruled out
>by the definition of mbox). Another problem is that different people
>over time may have the same mail address (this happens at Bristol
>university, where they are recycled). This is ruled out too by the
>definition of mbox.

Unfortunately, from the users point of view, the definition of mbox 
has no baring on the number of people associated with an email 

I'm feeling a bit Spinal Tap about this... Is "unambiguous" meant to 
mean in some way "uniquely valid". If so, then an email address is 
about as silly a value as one could ask for - especially when we have 
access to the URI of each FOAF document which seems to me to be quite 

Joe Tennis
Information Design Honcho
Joe 10 Group
2430 5th Street
Studio L
Berkeley, CA 94710
joe at joe10.com
Interaction Design | Technical Communication | Research & Analysis
for Web, Wireless and Interactive Media
If you're not doing it, you're not doing it.

More information about the foaf-dev mailing list