Ownership, foaf:owns and social services (Re: [rdfweb-dev] collecting FOAF spec updates)

[Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)]

I like thinking of FOAF as ground for social services. Depending on 
interest, one may want to use

* n1:OwnedAlbums or n1:AlbumsILookFor
* n2:Wishlist or n2:Hatelist (usefull in xmas;-)
* n3:StampsCollection
* n4:Car or n4:StolenCar or n4:SuspiciousLookingCarISawAndThinkIsStolen


Not the best examples I'm sure but you get what I mean. IMHO FOAF just 
needs AbstractThing and AbstractCollection. Then, I would be able to 
create terms for my vertical application and declare them as subclasses 
of the above; then fill with resources. Peers will (eventually) 
establish the mappings between terms and domains.

Not very precice or even well thought of, but the idea is clear i hope; 
we dont really need to invent terms but the infastructure for peers to 
develope their own.

Cheers,

Manos

-- 
Manos Batsis

     _  __    __                    __
    / |/ /__ / /____ __ _ ___ _____/ /_
   /    / -_) __(_-</  ' Y _ `/ __/ __/
  /_/|_/\__/\__/___/_/_/_|_,_/_/  \__/


http://www.netsmart.gr
mailto:mbatsisSPAM_TRAP at netsmart.gr
tel:+302103240940
http://forte.netsmart.gr/foaf/manos_foaf.rdf