[rdfweb-dev] Re: isbn - rdf:about or IFP
Dirk-Willem van Gulik
dirkx at asemantics.com
Mon Mar 15 12:00:54 UTC 2004
On 15/03/2004, at 9:38 AM, Jan Grant wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Dan Brickley wrote:
>> It seems the spec is clear that re-use is an error, so ISBNs _are_ IFP
>> and data that fails to resspect that is just plain wrong.
> So if a publisher has produced two books with the same ISBN then one
> doesn't exist? Suggest for "_are_" read "_should be_" - unless there's
> handy way to get this right other than just asserting that data is
> wrong? In the past the uniqueness of ISBNs was obviously seen as
> unimportant. Maybe a disambiguation rule that uses IFP for new-style
> ISBNs (which, one might hope, will be safely assigned in the future).
And, one might hope, can easily be recognized from the old ones :(.
More information about the foaf-dev