[rdfweb-dev] Clay Shirky - Relationship
marc at canter.com
Wed Mar 17 00:10:29 UTC 2004
Right on for the vocab and for your response to Mr. Curmudgeon Shirky.
Folks like him don't make software - they just bitch about it. Neither
do Ms. Boyd or Mr. Weinberger - though they don't like 'explicit'
relationships, they're yet to come up with an alternative.
So yes - along as we don't expect you to be perfect and to have to use
ALL kinds of relationships, I think your and Ian's approach is right on.
We'll be supporting it in the PeopleAggregator.
Ideally anybody - including the Tribe (I'm sitting in their office right
now), LiveJournal, TypePad, the AlwaysOn Zaibatsu, Ecademy or the super
secret Ziff-Davis project I've been working on - should be able to
contribute relationship types.
The more merrier actually.
From: rdfweb-dev-bounces at vapours.rdfweb.org
[mailto:rdfweb-dev-bounces at vapours.rdfweb.org] On Behalf Of Ian Davis
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 3:04 PM
To: Julian Bond
Cc: rdfweb-dev at vapours.rdfweb.org
Subject: Re: [rdfweb-dev] Clay Shirky - Relationship
On Tuesday, March 16, 2004, 8:17:57 PM, Julian Bond wrote:
> Clay rips into the relationship schema
I've written a short response.
http://internetalchemy.org | http://purl.org/NET/iand
rdfweb-dev mailing list
rdfweb-dev at vapours.rdfweb.org
More information about the foaf-dev