iand at internetalchemy.org
Tue Mar 15 14:50:10 UTC 2005
On 13/03/2005 22:03, Morten Frederiksen wrote:
> Good point, I'm fine with restricting to foaf:Agent if preferred.
It's better than rdf:resource but not ideal since it includes groups and
organizations. However, in the interests of moving the issue along, I'm
happy to use foaf:Agent. It shouldn't preclude us from changing it to a
subclass of foaf:Agent at a later date.
http://internetalchemy.org | http://purl.org/NET/iand
More information about the foaf-dev