[foaf-dev] Re: updated FOAF spec
henry.story at bblfish.net
Fri May 25 19:00:04 BST 2007
On 25 May 2007, at 02:09, Dan Brickley wrote:
> Thanks. I think first on the list, would be to help sketch some
> definitions for "stable", "unstable", "testing" for deployed RDF
> vocabularies, ie. help write down an account of the kinds of
> changes that might be considered acceptable in an otherwise stable
> vocabulary (and its documentation).
You need "deprecated" too. That is widely understood now from Java.
Neither stable nor unstable nor testing let us know if we should stop
using a term.
More information about the foaf-dev