[foaf-dev] Re: updated FOAF spec

Henry Story henry.story at bblfish.net
Fri May 25 19:00:04 BST 2007

On 25 May 2007, at 02:09, Dan Brickley wrote:

> Thanks. I think first on the list, would be to help sketch some  
> definitions for "stable", "unstable", "testing" for deployed RDF  
> vocabularies, ie. help write down an account of the kinds of  
> changes that might be considered acceptable in an otherwise stable  
> vocabulary (and its documentation).

You need "deprecated" too. That is widely understood now from Java.  
Neither stable nor unstable nor testing let us know if we should stop  
using a term.


More information about the foaf-dev mailing list