[foaf-dev] Re: RDF triple assertions live forever?
Phil Archer
parcher at icra.org
Fri Mar 28 09:58:07 GMT 2008
Being the one who kicked this off by making the original assertion
(which I actually got from someone else but almost certainly
mis-interpreted along the way) I feel I should give a little further input.
Actually, it's _good news_ (as well as common sense) that triples don't
get stored in perpetuity. I came to this from the standpoint of wanting
to make the statement (in a semantic way) that
foaf:Agent "will stand by the following assertions until" $date
Which is a little different from a cache header...
Phil.
Renato Golin wrote:
>
> Phillip Rhodes wrote:
>> In a discussion that has arisen recently on the foaf-dev list, somebody
>> pointed out that they've been told that RDF triples live forever.
>> That is, once something is asserted it is considered asserted until,
>> as it
>> was put, "the entropic heat death of the universe."
>
> Hi Phillip,
>
> This assertion is, to me, the same as to say all web pages are static,
> meaning that you can cache them locally without any further attempt to
> get it back from the server again.
>
> All web browsers have a fair cache policy which we're all used to
> (Shift-F5 and stuff) so no big deal to do the same with triples and RDF
> browsers.
>
> Also, with RDF is easier to say that site A has "the same triple as"
> another site B but with different content, who will you trust? Let's say
> you have a timestamp annotating the triples, would you still believe the
> "newest" one?
>
> Site A:
> renato is bad (today)
>
> Site B:
> renato is good (10 years ago)
>
> It's the same with RDFAuth, you have to trust someone sometime, you need
> a list of trusted sites, people, documents, beliefs. If your site says
> "renato is bad" it may "like" better Site A and even automatically add
> it to the "trusted sites" or even keep a score of things you agree with
> the site as the "automatic trust level" as opposed to your "hardcoded
> trust level" when you trust someone even if you don't agree with him/her.
>
> The possibilities are endless...
>
> cheers,
> --renato
>
>
>
--
Phil Archer
Chief Technical Officer,
Family Online Safety Institute
w. http://www.fosi.org/people/philarcher/
More information about the foaf-dev
mailing list