[foaf-dev] foaf:topic and dcterms:subject
danbri at danbri.org
Thu Apr 23 12:18:49 CEST 2009
On 23/4/09 10:37, Danny Ayers wrote:
> I was looking for a 'topic' term and landed on dcterms:subject 
> first, but then yesterday chatting with Leigh he mentioned foaf:topic
> I'm guessing the old DC Elements dc:subject would often be used with
> literal object, but the DC Terms definition explicitly suggests a
> non-literal object. So unless I'm missing something, these properties
> have very similar semantics (only real difference being foaf:topic
> rdfs:range foaf:Document).
> foaf:topic is presumably already too well deployed to deprecate, so to
> get some kind of alignment might it make sense to make foaf:topic
> rdfs:subPropertyOf dcterms:subject ?
> (dcterms:subject rdfs:subPropertyOf dcelements:subject which might
> mess up a few inferences if a literal object is used)
> Maybe for max connectivity in published data it would be best to
> include both properties (same ?s& ?o)..?
>  http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-subject
>  http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/#term_topic
More information about the foaf-dev