[foaf-dev] [foaf-protocols] FOAF sites offline during cleanup
kidehen at openlinksw.com
Sun Apr 26 21:47:47 CEST 2009
Hugh Glaser wrote:
> Yes, when Dan has recovered from the more urgent tasks he has, it would be good to have his reflections on what happened.
> I think the primary question I would like to know the answer to is:
> "Was there anything special about it being a "Semweb" site that created a vulnerability."
> Was it an equivalent of an SQL injection for SPARQL, or maybe it was through a SPARQL endpoint, or something else RDF?
> Or maybe it was "just" a standard hack, and we shouldn't get ourselves over-concerned about the RDFness.
> My sympathy, of course.
You beat me to it :-)
I would very much like the specifics of what happened once the dust
settles. More to gain than lose long term.
> On 26/04/2009 18:38, "Peter Krantz" <peter.krantz at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hijacking this thread back to the original topic:
> How can we help? Two important areas to start working with:
> 1. How to get your servers back online in a clean uninfected state and,
> 2. how do we provide security recommendations for people who publish
> semweb data online?
> Anyone who is willing to help out?
> Peter Krantz
> foaf-protocols mailing list
> foaf-protocols at lists.foaf-project.org
Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
President & CEO
OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
More information about the foaf-dev