[foaf-dev] [foaf-protocols] FOAF sites offline during cleanup
kidehen at openlinksw.com
Mon Apr 27 12:57:35 CEST 2009
Dan Brickley wrote:
> On 27/4/09 10:18, Ian Davis wrote:
>> Sorry to hear about the attack on your server. If there's anything I or
>> Talis can do to help, just let me know.
>> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri at danbri.org
>> <mailto:danbri at danbri.org>> wrote:
>> Thanks everyone for the concern and offers of help. It'll take a few
>> days to figure out the best way to make the Web side of the project more
>> helpable. In the meantime http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core/ is worth
>> some attention!
>> With the lessening emphasis on RDF/XML, shouldn't we be looking at
>> signing the triples. I seem to recall a paper by Jeremy Carroll that
>> discussed this. Also, now many of us are focussed on bnode-free linked
>> data the problems of signing are much easier: serialise as ntriples,
>> sort and sign the result.
> A lot of the hairyness of xmlsig comes from the transforms. I prefer
> signing something nice and concrete, whether XML, RDFa or JSON.
> What % of "linked data" is truly free of bnodes?
I would safely say re. LOD Cloud somewhere north of 80% :-) And thats
primary due to the content coming from PingTheSemanticWeb, otherwise I
would say 90% and higher. The "Linked Data" meme has always encouraged
URIs for everything.
> foaf-protocols mailing list
> foaf-protocols at lists.foaf-project.org
Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
President & CEO
OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
More information about the foaf-dev