[foaf-dev] beyond foaf:mbox_sha1sum
henry.story at bblfish.net
Tue Dec 22 14:24:42 CET 2009
On 22 Dec 2009, at 13:11, Norman Gray wrote:
> Mischa, hello.
> On 2009 Dec 22, at 12:55, Norman Gray wrote:
>> * If I just put in my URI (http://nxg.me.uk/norman/ in this case), it objects that
>> * But the form does say to put in a FOAF document, so if I put in http://nxg.me.uk/norman/ttl (which is served as application/x-turtle),
> By the way, on closer examination the page does say "Enter the URI for the RDF/XML document you would like to check", but (a) no-one ever reads the instructions, especially when they're below the input box!, and (b) the validator gets most of the way with the two other alternatives (it successfully does the 303-dance, and parses the RDF, in the first case, and runs the input Turtle through rapper in the second case), so it looks like only hiccups that stop it doing the Right Thing in both these cases.
In input boxes like this one should allow people to put URIs that indirectly point to foaf documents, and follow through as much as possible. Users will not know the difference between foaf documents, foaf people, etc...
If a foaf document does not have a primary topic, or if it points to a file that points to a number of foaf files, one should ask the user which person he really is by presenting a list of possible users he could be.
I did this with http://test.foaf-ssl.net/cert/ (though in most other respects the user interface is horrible).
More information about the foaf-dev