[foaf-dev] [foaf-protocols] revisiting FOAF project goals
henry.story at bblfish.net
Wed Jun 24 14:49:16 CEST 2009
On 24 Jun 2009, at 14:44, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
> You have some options here:
The relationship vocab is a bit broken in my opinion. For example the
A property representing a person whom this person would desire to know
more closely. Having this property implies being afoaf:Person. Every
value of this property is a foaf:Person. It is a sub-property of
But if wouldLikeToKnow is a subproperty of foaf:knows, then the two
have interacted allready. So should it should be named
A property representing a person who has come to be known to this
person through their actions or position. Having this property implies
being a foaf:Person. Every value of this property is a foaf:Person. It
is a sub-property of foaf:knows."
if you know of someone according to the definition, then you don't
foaf:know them. But it does make it a subproperty of foaf:knows.
I reported this a while ago.
More information about the foaf-dev