[foaf-dev] works relation
Kingsley Idehen
kidehen at openlinksw.com
Fri Feb 5 20:47:52 CET 2010
Story Henry wrote:
> On 5 Feb 2010, at 20:41, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>
>
>> Story Henry wrote:
>>
>>> On 5 Feb 2010, at 20:31, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> yes, except that this ontology is pretty crap. I have pointed out a few years ago that it does not make sense, and I have seen no action to improve it. Take just for exampel:
>>>>>
>>>>> <wouldLikeToKnow> a rdf:Property;
>>>>> :domain <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Person>;
>>>>> :isDefinedBy <>;
>>>>> :label "would like to now"@en;
>>>>> :range <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Person>;
>>>>> :subPropertyOf <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/knows>;
>>>>> skos:definition "A person whom this person would desire to know more closely."@en .
>>>>>
>>>>> from this if you wouldLikeToKnow someone, then you know them.
>>>>> Which is nonsensical. So I wouldLikeToKnow SamanthaFox, therefore I know her!
>>>>>
>>>> Okay, scrap that relation.
>>>>
>>>> I focused on the employment terms, albeit for my own selfish purposes i.e., verifying new reasoner features in Virtuoso :-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Don't get me wrong. I like the names of all those relations, but until they are a bit surer they should remove any of the relations that have entailment consequences. But they seem completely unresponsive to feedback, as far as I can see... So they should be avoided.
>>>
>>>
>> Sure, that why "reasoning act" should be subjective re. SPARQL.
>>
>> We have context rules that are optionally associated with SPARQL queries via compiler pragmas :-)
>>
>
> yes, of course we will need that. Reasoning is just more complex on the linked data web than in closed environments. But still I'd avoid ontologies that are obviously broken. I may just make a copy of that one, fix it, and put it on my server.
>
Henry,
In my data space its just a SPARUL based DELETE re. offending triples :-)
Kingsley
> Henry
>
--
Regards,
Kingsley Idehen
President & CEO
OpenLink Software
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter: kidehen
More information about the foaf-dev
mailing list