[foaf-dev] Wishlists / requests for next rev of FOAF spec?
zazi at smiy.org
Tue Jun 12 03:16:03 EDT 2012
On 06/03/2012 09:49 PM, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
> On Wednesday 30. May 2012 18.00.26 Dan Brickley wrote:
>> Yeah, it's about time we shipped a new one.
>> Anyone else got suggestions?
> I always wanted a foaf:personal_phone, which would be a subproperty of
> foaf:phone and an IFP/key/or something. My phone number is probably one of
> my strongest identifiers these days.
> Also, perhaps some terms should change status. I would suggest the
> following upgraded to stable:
+1 for upgrading the majority of these terms to stable. However, I would
exclude the homepage relations (foaf:schoolHomepage and
foaf:workplaceHomepage), because one would rather link a workplace
and/or school resource today (which can even have a more detailed
Re. modelling the "like" relation, I would also suggest to have a look
at the Association Ontology , whose approach was a bit different
because it modelled the "like" relation from the object direction and
which is a bit more verbose.
More information about the foaf-dev