[foaf-protocols] I just saw a post about building a WoT without signing parties

[Story Henry]

On 29 Jan 2009, at 20:42, Dan Brickley wrote:

> FYI ... spotted on the PGP-Basics at yahoogroups.com list.
>
> Henry, AFAIK you're not from the anti-party party, are you? :)

Ah no of course not :-)

> Having pgp-party style verification of online/worldly identities  
> still seems useful to me, I just think it'll begin to be done using  
> different toolchains and environments too.

You have to meet people before you party and often party to meet  
people too.

Henry

> Dan
>
> On 29/1/09 20:01, Faramir wrote:
>>
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> I saw this document
>> http://blogs.sun.com/bblfish/entry/more_on_authorization_in_foaf
>> <http://blogs.sun.com/bblfish/entry/more_on_authorization_in_foaf>
>>
>> It says there is a way to build a WoT without requiring keysingning
>> parties, but I didn't understood too much of the document... What  
>> is it
>> about?
>