henry.story at bblfish.net
Tue Apr 20 11:28:22 CEST 2010
On 20 Apr 2010, at 08:47, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
> That sort of reminds me of something  ;)
> So, I asked a round a bit  and the answer essentially was: go register
> one ... fancy doing it together?
The latest document draft-nottingham is here btw
One could just register it by adding the relation in the acl ontology such as
acl:rules a rdf:Property;
As you can see in the 5.5 examples, you can have a rel value as a URL. ( So in this it is similar to
atom). The only disadvantage then is that you don't get the nice shorthand, for inclusion in Atom XML,
and other documents.
So I suppose the best would be to add the relation first to the ontology, work out a good wording
for it, test it out, then ask for the IETF shorthand, the put an owl:sameAs link to the ietf one, which
hopefully we can then convince them to serve up as linked data.
I'd be happy to support a document for the link. It seems to me the Atom folks could find that very
useful. Not sure yet how cold they are towards rdf still.
>  http://webofdata.wordpress.com/2010/03/04/wod-access-control-discovery/
>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2010JanMar/0218.html
> Dr. Michael Hausenblas
> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
> Ireland, Europe
> Tel. +353 91 495730
>> From: Nathan <nathan at webr3.org>
>> Organization: webr3
>> Reply-To: <nathan at webr3.org>
>> Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 22:37:41 +0100
>> To: Linked Data community <public-lod at w3.org>, foaf-protocols
>> <foaf-protocols at lists.foaf-project.org>
>> Subject: [foaf-protocols] ACL
>> Hi All,
>> I'm just trying to get an implementation of web access control  off
>> the ground and have hit upon a small issue.
>> I'm planning on exposing links to acl files via the Link header as
>> directed, however I've realised there is no rel="" for it, hence i was
>> opting for a custom temporary type. On a first look a relation of
>> acl:acl looks to be the one, but after checking the actual ontology the
>> acl:acl link simply isn't there, thus in the meantime I've opted for:
>> Link: </.wac/everyone.n3>; rel="http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/acl#";
>> title="Access Control File"
>> Any improvements, or refinements welcome, as the above is just a
>> temporary measure.
>> foaf-protocols mailing list
>> foaf-protocols at lists.foaf-project.org
More information about the foaf-protocols