[foaf-protocols] Debugging results

Reto Bachmann-Gmür me at farewellutopia.com
Sun Aug 1 23:50:34 CEST 2010

On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Henry Story <henry.story at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1 Aug 2010, at 23:42, Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Henry Story <henry.story at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> https://farewellutopia.com/user/me/profile#me
>>>> returns: doesn't return any RDF, rather it returns standard XHTML -
>>>> accept sent is: application/rdf+xml, text/rdf+n3,
>>>> application/rdf+turtle, application/x-turtle, application/turtle,
>>>> application/xml, */*
>>>> note: can you check it out reto, if you're not already aware
>>> yes there does not seem to be any rdfa in there
>>> $ rapper -i rdfa  https://farewellutopia.com/user/me/profile  -o turtle
>>> returns an empty doc
>> which should be ok as long as content-negotiation works correctly
>> (which i'm fixing now, currently it chooses of the most concrete
>> acceptetd types with the highest q-value the one who comes first
>> alphabetically, in this case application/turtle but as this isn't
>> supported it falls back to xhtml).
> Well I checked the html, and I don't think it contains rdfa either.

no the html doesn't contain rdfa, but rdf/xml, turtle, rdf/json and
-n-triples representations are available.


More information about the foaf-protocols mailing list