[foaf-protocols] Debugging results
Nathan
nathan at webr3.org
Mon Aug 2 00:12:22 CEST 2010
Henry Story wrote:
> On 1 Aug 2010, at 21:33, Nathan wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I checked to see what's wrong with my little test script @
>> https://data.fm/ and here's the results:
>>
>> csarven
>> returns: RDF/XML
>> uses cert:Integer for exponent and I was only checking for 'cert:int'
>> note: can we specify only one please (why have two??)
>
> That is because the ontology does not define cert:Integer to be a property. It defined cert:decimal, but that has been deprecated.
>
> We are trying to move entirely over to using dataytypes.
> I created a cert:int datatype to match the cert:hex datatype.
> I could have turned cert:decimal into a datatype too, but the problem is that
> decimal in most people's minds does not make them think of base10 numbers, but rather of floating point numbers.
>
> If you look at the ontology using you will find cert:int defined as
>
>
> $ curl -H "Accept: text/n3" http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/cert
>
> [snip]
>
> :int a rdfs:Datatype;
> vs:term_status "unstable";
> owl:equivalentClass xsd:nonNegativeInteger;
> skos:editorialNote """
> We may decide to make it easier to write integers than what xsd:integer provides, if needed.
> """@en;
> rdfs:comment """
> A positive integer in base 10 notation.
> xsd:nonNegativeInteger could be used, but is a bit long to write, and may be too strictly defined.
> This is here to provice a pair with cert:hex, to avoid needing to import a new namespace, and to give a bit more flexibility in the future.
> """@en .
why not just:
rsa:modulus "FDB6FB1159710EAEEC69BEE94..."^^xsd:hexBinary ;
rsa:public_exponent "65537"^^xsd:nonNegativeInteger .
out of interest - never quite understood the cert:xxx's tbh.
>> http://bblfish.net/people/henry/card#me
>> returns: N3
>> issue1: ARC chokes on the .n3
>> issue2: accept line was Accept: application/rdf+xml, text/rdf+n3,
>> application/rdf+turtle, application/x-turtle, application/turtle,
>> application/xml, */* - and .n3 was returned (surely it should have been
>> application/rdf+xml the .rdf variant?)
>> note: henry can you check your conneg if you have it enabled.
^^ checking you noticed
Best,
Nathan
More information about the foaf-protocols
mailing list