[foaf-protocols] Debugging results

Henry Story henry.story at gmail.com
Mon Aug 2 00:30:55 CEST 2010

On 2 Aug 2010, at 00:29, Nathan wrote:

>>>> Should every representation for a WebID be semanticizable? (Does not quite
>>>> seem like it should, and in any case they can't all be known)
>>> yes, if it isn't then it's not a webid, id's just a URI, or worse, an URL -
>>> debatable?
>> no, there's no reason to forbid people from providing other
>> representation for their personal profile document as long as at least
>> one representation of the resource should be be triples or
>> "semanticizable"
> ahh yes I follow now - also would need to have the fragments identified 
> the same I think (if it had them).

yes, it would not be good it the same URL had different meanings in different representations. It would lead to confusion, and the responsibility for the would be squarely on the shoulders of the publisher.


More information about the foaf-protocols mailing list