[foaf-protocols] First WebID Teleconference minutes (July 27th 2010)
nathan at webr3.org
Mon Aug 2 19:09:38 CEST 2010
Henry Story wrote:
> On 2 Aug 2010, at 18:45, Nathan wrote:
>> I really like that sentence - perfect even imho.
>> 'MUST have a Machine and Human readable representation of a structured
>> profile document'
> "MUST have a representation of an RDF graph in a machine readable representation. See the section on representations for more about this."
> You cannot force a Human readable representation in the spec. That is again a pragmatic issue. If you don't have one, then in many use cases it will be difficult for people to understand what is going on, so takeup will be slow.
> This will become obvious when we have more good demos.
1: MUST have a representation of what exactly? just any old graph? a
profile? or the public key or?
2: MUST have a MRD, SHOULD have a HRD || are encouraged to have an HRD -
i.e. stick to only the must's or also include the very beneficial?
More information about the foaf-protocols