[foaf-protocols] WebID spec http://bblfish.net/tmp/2010/08/09/index-respec.html
scorlosquet at gmail.com
Mon Aug 9 18:45:57 CEST 2010
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Henry Story <henry.story at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the pointers and the update.
> A few very quick points:
> - Section 2.4 should be section 3. The protocol assumes that the
> preconditions are in place, but is itself a top level element.
Good catch, oversight on my side when I merged your changes earlier. Fixed
index-respec.html as well as draft and diff files.
> I made that change to a new version I pushed up to my git repository which
> incorporates your changes and pushed them onto my tmp dir
> On 9 Aug 2010, at 17:31, Stéphane Corlosquet wrote:
> > +1 to specs with diagrams. It looked quite big at first sight but I'm
> > with a bit of polishing it'll fit perfectly in the document.
> > re generating the index.html, you can find some instructions at
> > In short, CTRL+SHIFT+ALT+s, save as XHTML (source). To save some time in
> > light of tomorrow conf call, I created a new draft, ED-webid-20100809
> > incorporate Henry's changes as well as some other issues I committed in
> > past few days with the following changelog: Updates from WebID community:
> > OpenID and OAuth sections moved to separate document, switched to the URI
> > terminology instead of URL, added "Creating the certificate" and
> > the WebID Profile document" section with a WebID graph and serializations
> > Turtle and RDFa, improved SPARQL queries using literal notation with cert
> > datatypes, updated list of contributors, and many other fixes.
> > Here is hoping Manu can push it to http://payswarm.com/webid/ so we can
> > look at the same version of the spec tomorrow. For now it's at
> > http://files.openspring.net/2010/08/webid-spec/
> > Steph.
> > On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 5:43 AM, Henry Story <henry.story at gmail.com>
> >> I have updated the draft spec now with sketches of RDFa, RDF/XML,
> >> and a placeholder for GRDDL. This is explained by showing how they all
> >> representations for the same graph, which I have included as an image I
> >> created with OmniGraffle.
> >> I was thinking initially we should have a very minimal core spec and a
> >> number of specs surrounding this one. But I think now, after having
> >> the discussion over the past two weeks that we should perhaps do the
> >> splitting later if it is needed at all. The reason is that a lot of our
> >> discussion concerns issues with content negotiation, and that clearly if
> >> don't cover that in the spec in an obvious and clear way, people will
> >> ask exactly the same questions that have been going round and round on
> >> list.
> >> Note the above is just tentative, but I thought we should at least add
> >> in. We can improve the language and examples, and correct mistakes in
> >> course.
> >> I have made this version available online here
> >> http://bblfish.net/tmp/2010/08/09/index-respec.html
> >> And it is in github here
> >> http://github.com/bblfish/webid-spec
> >> Btw, it would be nice to link this version to the previous one, and that
> >> one to this one. What is the best way to do this? Also how do I generate
> >> final index.html ?
> >> Henry
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> foaf-protocols mailing list
> >> foaf-protocols at lists.foaf-project.org
> >> http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-protocols
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the foaf-protocols