[foaf-protocols] Multiple URIs in SAN extension

Reto Bachmann-Gmür me at farewellutopia.com
Tue Aug 10 09:11:47 CEST 2010


My latest draft, which I think you pulled mandates exactly one URI.

I don't know about reasons or avantages of having multiple uris.

Cheers,
reto

----- Original message -----
> On 08/09/2010 08:48 PM, Stéphane Corlosquet wrote:
> > I'm on Bruno's side and I think we should not lock down the SAN to
> > exactly one URI. If there is time and interest tomorrow during the
> > call, I'd like to raise this issue.
> 
> Stéphane,
> 
> Can you log it as a bug against the spec?
> 
> http://github.com/msporny/webid-spec/issues
> 
> -- manu
> 
> -- 
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
> President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: WebID - Universal Login for the Web
> http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2010/08/07/webid/2/
> _______________________________________________
> foaf-protocols mailing list
> foaf-protocols at lists.foaf-project.org
> http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-protocols

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.foaf-project.org/pipermail/foaf-protocols/attachments/20100810/4fce27a8/attachment.htm 


More information about the foaf-protocols mailing list