[foaf-protocols] Webid Spec: Reference to the X.509 RFC 5280?

Akbar Hossain akkiehossain at gmail.com
Fri Aug 13 23:53:29 CEST 2010

Sorry -  I should have said why I was looking for it!

I was reading thru http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#section-

Which I thought was the definition of the permitted values within the
Subject Alternative Name (SAN)

I guess this is a possible reference too.


I was thinking that a section of the spec could be structured as a
table with the permitted entries in SAN
and the possible ways to deference the agent details.

We dont need to (or cant) specify all but it would be easy to
visualise how other deferencing schemes to discover the identifying
agents profile could be added to the spec at a later stage if for
example against email we listed webfinger and fingerpoint for example.

Just a thought.

On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Bruno Harbulot
<Bruno.Harbulot at manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
> On 13/08/2010 20:53, Akbar Hossain wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Minor suggestion. Perhaps we should add a link (reference) to the X.509 RFC.
>> I think it is here. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280
> I'm not sure if we need to. This isn't the X.509 RFC but the PKIX RFC,
> which is exactly what we avoid to do. (The X.509 specification isn't an
> Best wishes,
> Bruno.
> _______________________________________________
> foaf-protocols mailing list
> foaf-protocols at lists.foaf-project.org
> http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-protocols

More information about the foaf-protocols mailing list