[foaf-protocols] Webid Spec: Reference to the X.509 RFC 5280?
danbri at danbri.org
Mon Aug 16 14:38:48 CEST 2010
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen at openlinksw.com> wrote:
> On 8/16/10 12:16 PM, Bruno Harbulot wrote:
>> The PKIX spec (RFC 5280) is based on X.509, so it does repeat some of
>> the content of the X.509 spec and puts it into context (for a PKI).
>> However, the permitted values for the SAN are in the X.509 Specification.
>> (section 220.127.116.11)
>> Regarding Webfinger/Fingerpoint, I'm not quite sure how widespread this
>> is yet.
> Since GMAIL and AOL both support Webfinger, I think its safe to assume
> wide spread use of resolvable "acct:" and "mailto:" scheme URIs which
> are discovered via emerging .well-known/host-meta resource mechanism and associated XRD resources.
I'm not sure there is quite so much enthusiasm for acct: around
currently, in particular Eran seems to be having second thoughts. For
eg see discussion around
ps. somewhat related, discussion of 3 different flavours of identifier
in OAuth2-based "OpenID Connect",
More information about the foaf-protocols