[foaf-protocols] Upcoming WebID telecon topics (was: W3C WebID review)

Stéphane Corlosquet scorlosquet at gmail.com
Sun Aug 22 14:30:06 CEST 2010


Regrets as well, will be at DrupalCon the whole week. I will however present
WebID in a lightning talk.

Steph.

On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Melvin Carvalho
<melvincarvalho at gmail.com>wrote:

>
>
> On 20 August 2010 18:44, Manu Sporny <msporny at digitalbazaar.com> wrote:
>
>> On 08/20/10 10:59, Henry Story wrote:
>> > On 20 Aug 2010, at 16:01, Manu Sporny wrote:
>> >> Thanks for the clarifications of your intent - it helps to shed
>> >> some light on your thinking. I understand a bit more where you are
>> >> coming from and have only picked out the bits that I disagree with
>> >> below - so while this e-mail may seem negative, it is not intended
>> >> to be - rather, I think we have some understanding at this point
>> >> and can move on.
>> >
>> > Thanks for your reply. I read it carefully, but in the interest of
>> > not going on forever here, I'll just summarise my take on it.
>>
>> Henry, your latest response is wonderful. I think there is a much deeper
>> understanding now, thank you for taking the time to consider the points
>> raised in the discussion.
>>
>> I'll post a draft agenda shortly for the WebID telecon next week on
>> Tuesday - are there any preferences on what we should cover?
>>
>
> Regrets I wont be able to make this.  Would love to participate in this,
> but I'd like to focus my fullest attention on my actions for the SWXG final
> report (which also will cover WebID)which is due out next month, and there's
> still a lot to cover.  Hopefully will be able to participate more from
> October onwards.
>
> Will follow the minutes, and mailing list closely, as ever, though.
>
> General preference is to keep the core spec as 'lean and mean' as possible,
> and allow supporting documentation e.g. wiki, primer, best practices if
> that's allowable.
>
>
>
>>
>> Stephane detailed the multiple URI issue in the SAN extension, so we
>> could make that the first item:
>>
>> http://github.com/msporny/webid-spec/issues/#issue/2
>>
>> We need to understand the technical hurdles for selective presentation
>> of WebID-only certificates:
>>
>> http://github.com/msporny/webid-spec/issues#issue/3
>>
>> and perhaps WebID certificate transfer:
>>
>> http://github.com/msporny/webid-spec/issues#issue/4
>>
>> We should determine whether now is a good time to shift to a github
>> account for the community:
>>
>
> Well github issue tracker has improved since I last looked at it.
> Personally I use www.assembla.com (free for open source projects) but
> whatever works.
>
> ManU: you mentioned that there had been some concerns raised externally.
> Is the intention here to put these in the github issue list?
>
>
>>
>> http://github.com/msporny/webid-spec/issues#issue/5
>>
>> What are the other technical/usability issues that we should discuss?
>>
>> -- manu
>>
>> --
>> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
>> President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
>> blog: WebID - Universal Login for the Web
>> http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2010/08/07/webid/2/
>> _______________________________________________
>> foaf-protocols mailing list
>> foaf-protocols at lists.foaf-project.org
>> http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-protocols
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foaf-protocols mailing list
> foaf-protocols at lists.foaf-project.org
> http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-protocols
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.foaf-project.org/pipermail/foaf-protocols/attachments/20100822/a974c3d6/attachment.htm 


More information about the foaf-protocols mailing list