[foaf-protocols] Upcoming WebID telecon topics (was: W3C WebID review)
me at farewellutopia.com
Mon Aug 23 20:39:15 CEST 2010
I would like to add to the topics:
- Web Of Trust: adding transitive trust features, signing other's
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Stéphane Corlosquet
<scorlosquet at gmail.com>wrote:
> Regrets as well, will be at DrupalCon the whole week. I will however
> present WebID in a lightning talk.
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>> On 20 August 2010 18:44, Manu Sporny <msporny at digitalbazaar.com> wrote:
>>> On 08/20/10 10:59, Henry Story wrote:
>>> > On 20 Aug 2010, at 16:01, Manu Sporny wrote:
>>> >> Thanks for the clarifications of your intent - it helps to shed
>>> >> some light on your thinking. I understand a bit more where you are
>>> >> coming from and have only picked out the bits that I disagree with
>>> >> below - so while this e-mail may seem negative, it is not intended
>>> >> to be - rather, I think we have some understanding at this point
>>> >> and can move on.
>>> > Thanks for your reply. I read it carefully, but in the interest of
>>> > not going on forever here, I'll just summarise my take on it.
>>> Henry, your latest response is wonderful. I think there is a much deeper
>>> understanding now, thank you for taking the time to consider the points
>>> raised in the discussion.
>>> I'll post a draft agenda shortly for the WebID telecon next week on
>>> Tuesday - are there any preferences on what we should cover?
>> Regrets I wont be able to make this. Would love to participate in this,
>> but I'd like to focus my fullest attention on my actions for the SWXG final
>> report (which also will cover WebID)which is due out next month, and there's
>> still a lot to cover. Hopefully will be able to participate more from
>> October onwards.
>> Will follow the minutes, and mailing list closely, as ever, though.
>> General preference is to keep the core spec as 'lean and mean' as
>> possible, and allow supporting documentation e.g. wiki, primer, best
>> practices if that's allowable.
>>> Stephane detailed the multiple URI issue in the SAN extension, so we
>>> could make that the first item:
>>> We need to understand the technical hurdles for selective presentation
>>> of WebID-only certificates:
>>> and perhaps WebID certificate transfer:
>>> We should determine whether now is a good time to shift to a github
>>> account for the community:
>> Well github issue tracker has improved since I last looked at it.
>> Personally I use www.assembla.com (free for open source projects) but
>> whatever works.
>> ManU: you mentioned that there had been some concerns raised externally.
>> Is the intention here to put these in the github issue list?
>>> What are the other technical/usability issues that we should discuss?
>>> -- manu
>>> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
>>> President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
>>> blog: WebID - Universal Login for the Web
>>> foaf-protocols mailing list
>>> foaf-protocols at lists.foaf-project.org
>> foaf-protocols mailing list
>> foaf-protocols at lists.foaf-project.org
> foaf-protocols mailing list
> foaf-protocols at lists.foaf-project.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the foaf-protocols