[foaf-protocols] webid-linked claim verification?

Kingsley Idehen kidehen at openlinksw.com
Mon Aug 30 13:46:37 CEST 2010


  On 8/30/10 4:45 AM, Henry Story wrote:
> On 30 Aug 2010, at 00:35, Nathan wrote:
>
>> Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>>> On 26 August 2010 17:35, Seth Russell<russell.seth at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> In other words.  I want a library with the following 4 functions ...
>>>>
>>>> $id = signup()
>>>> $id = signin()
>>>> sendMessage ($id, $message)
>>>>
>>> I think every webid should have a semantic inbox
>> 100% agree re semantic inbox, and like seth's focus on simplicity
> Agree on semantic inbox. So we could develop something simple like the following:
>
> @prefox<http://joe.example/#>  .
>
> :me webmail:inbox</inbox/>;
>      ....
>
>
> As with pingback,</inbox/>  should return an html form, with a message field for the referent of the webid (with a well known attribute name). The page could have a type
>
> <>  a webmail:PostPage;
>     webmail:recipient<http://joe.example/#me>  .
>
> It is very important that the PostPage refer back to the webid, as that is what is needed to avoid spamming.
>
>     This is a simple protocol we could develop easily.

So we just do it! :-)

Like Semantic Pingbacks, we are showing how WebID is addressing current 
problem areas. Basically, issues that Web 2.0 simply cannot solve.


Kingsley
> Henry
>
> _______________________________________________
> foaf-protocols mailing list
> foaf-protocols at lists.foaf-project.org
> http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-protocols
>


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
President&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen







More information about the foaf-protocols mailing list