[foaf-protocols] webid-linked claim verification?
kidehen at openlinksw.com
Mon Aug 30 13:46:37 CEST 2010
On 8/30/10 4:45 AM, Henry Story wrote:
> On 30 Aug 2010, at 00:35, Nathan wrote:
>> Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>>> On 26 August 2010 17:35, Seth Russell<russell.seth at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> In other words. I want a library with the following 4 functions ...
>>>> $id = signup()
>>>> $id = signin()
>>>> sendMessage ($id, $message)
>>> I think every webid should have a semantic inbox
>> 100% agree re semantic inbox, and like seth's focus on simplicity
> Agree on semantic inbox. So we could develop something simple like the following:
> @prefox<http://joe.example/#> .
> :me webmail:inbox</inbox/>;
> As with pingback,</inbox/> should return an html form, with a message field for the referent of the webid (with a well known attribute name). The page could have a type
> <> a webmail:PostPage;
> webmail:recipient<http://joe.example/#me> .
> It is very important that the PostPage refer back to the webid, as that is what is needed to avoid spamming.
> This is a simple protocol we could develop easily.
So we just do it! :-)
Like Semantic Pingbacks, we are showing how WebID is addressing current
problem areas. Basically, issues that Web 2.0 simply cannot solve.
> foaf-protocols mailing list
> foaf-protocols at lists.foaf-project.org
More information about the foaf-protocols