[foaf-protocols] WebID spec: supported RDF formats
henry.story at gmail.com
Sun Jul 18 08:02:53 CEST 2010
On 18 Jul 2010, at 01:28, Jiří Procházka wrote:
> Why just one serialization? Because it greatly simplifies the
> implementation and as I have explained to in the post you reply to, it
> should be required on both the verification and publication side. If
> ease of adoption is of major priority, you should understand it.
I think all foaf+ssl implementations already support 2 serialisations
at least. If you have a RDF toolkit it always comes with a few. So this is
really not a problem.
And above simiplicity of use it is much more important to have flexibility.
Publishers should be able to publish as easily as possible for them. RDFa
is now popular but often rdf/xml is better.
More information about the foaf-protocols