[foaf-protocols] WebID spec: supported RDF formats

Melvin Carvalho melvincarvalho at gmail.com
Sun Jul 18 16:44:02 CEST 2010


On 18 July 2010 16:41, Henry Story <henry.story at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On 18 Jul 2010, at 16:39, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>
> >>>
> >>> Why just one serialization? Because it greatly simplifies the
> >>> implementation and as I have explained to in the post you reply to, it
> >>> should be required on both the verification and publication side. If
> >>> ease of adoption is of major priority, you should understand it.
> >>
> >
> > +1
>
> -10
>
> Which serialisation would you go for? RDFa or RDF/XML?
>

Sorry not sure I got that across well.

My +1 was for Kinsley's comment.

I favour the 'deceptively simple' approach

I would give examples of serializations in RDF/XML and RDFa, yes.


>
> Henry
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.foaf-project.org/pipermail/foaf-protocols/attachments/20100718/91d46bd5/attachment-0001.htm 


More information about the foaf-protocols mailing list