[foaf-protocols] WebID spec: supported RDF formats (bis)

[Bruno Harbulot]

>> 5) Who thinks there should be a strongly recommended (SHOULD)
>> intersection between the formats supported between the WebID provider
>> and the Verification agent? (Same as above, but does one of the parties
>> use 'SHOULD' and the other 'MUST'? Which?)
>
> Not clear to me what you mean.

Sorry if I wasn't clear. It's the deference between:
Verification Agents MUST support all the required formats (RDF/XML and
HTML/RDFa) and WebID provider MUST support at least one of these two.

and:
Verification Agents MUST support all the required formats (RDF/XML and
HTML/RDFa) and WebID provider SHOULD support at least one of these two.

or even perhaps:
Verification Agents SHOULD support all the required formats (RDF/XML and 
HTML/RDFa) and WebID provider SHOULD support at least one of these two.


Best wishes,

Bruno.