[foaf-protocols] what if

Henry Story henry.story at gmail.com
Mon Jul 19 06:41:43 CEST 2010


On 19 Jul 2010, at 02:43, Kingsley Idehen wrote:

>> 
>> 
>> another very valid point - well said Bruno
>> 
> 
> Yes, but do note, there is a vocabulary for HTTP [1]. All worth 
> revisiting at the right time :-)
> 
> Links:
> 
> 1. http://www.w3.org/TR/HTTP-in-RDF10/

A very bad vocabulary by the way. It is modelling http headers in RDF at the syntactic level. If you want an ontology that models the metdata in the headers semantically look at the ontology developed by the tabulator.

Henry


More information about the foaf-protocols mailing list