[foaf-protocols] what if
kidehen at openlinksw.com
Mon Jul 19 12:45:39 CEST 2010
Henry Story wrote:
> On 19 Jul 2010, at 02:43, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>>> another very valid point - well said Bruno
>> Yes, but do note, there is a vocabulary for HTTP . All worth
>> revisiting at the right time :-)
>> 1. http://www.w3.org/TR/HTTP-in-RDF10/
> A very bad vocabulary by the way. It is modelling http headers in RDF at the syntactic level. If you want an ontology that models the metdata in the headers semantically look at the ontology developed by the tabulator.
Yes, but at the right time :-)
My main point was about the existence of vocabularies for HTTP etc...
President & CEO
More information about the foaf-protocols