[foaf-protocols] Using @rel to broaden scope of what we currently call FOAF+SSL

[Melvin Carvalho]

2010/5/13 Story Henry <henry.story at bblfish.net>

> On 13 May 2010, at 17:40, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>
> > I think you are missing my fundamental point.
> >
> > This is an option.
> >
> > An option is but one item in a contimuum.
>
> As I said in the other thread, we don't have a lot of people.
> Much more important is to get this accepted by a standards body.
>
> I think we should proceed on with that next.
>

+1

Definitely interested in taking part.

Maybe the "Web Identity Working Group"?

Duration -- how long do you think it will take?

Staring when, before the SWXG technical report, or after?


>
> Henry
> _______________________________________________
> foaf-protocols mailing list
> foaf-protocols at lists.foaf-project.org
> http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-protocols
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.foaf-project.org/pipermail/foaf-protocols/attachments/20100513/e253f7eb/attachment.htm