[foaf-protocols] Using @rel to broaden scope of what we currently call FOAF+SSL
melvincarvalho at gmail.com
Thu May 13 19:17:43 CEST 2010
2010/5/13 Story Henry <henry.story at bblfish.net>
> On 13 May 2010, at 17:40, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> > I think you are missing my fundamental point.
> > This is an option.
> > An option is but one item in a contimuum.
> As I said in the other thread, we don't have a lot of people.
> Much more important is to get this accepted by a standards body.
> I think we should proceed on with that next.
Definitely interested in taking part.
Maybe the "Web Identity Working Group"?
Duration -- how long do you think it will take?
Staring when, before the SWXG technical report, or after?
> foaf-protocols mailing list
> foaf-protocols at lists.foaf-project.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the foaf-protocols