[foaf-protocols] catchy logo, catchy name

[Story Henry]

On Twitter Seth Russel suggested 

"[foaf+ssl] needs a catchy name and a catchy logo ... it's way too hard to even refer to it ...& needs a generic authorize me button" [1]

Seth, so we have "WebId" as a reasonably catchy name,  and the following logo

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Image:foaf+ssl$foaf_keylock_small.png
Type: image/png
Size: 4298 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.foaf-project.org/pipermail/foaf-protocols/attachments/20100516/eb6b2a0a/attachment.png 
-------------- next part --------------


which is kind of cute. foaf+ssl is the technology. But WebId is the name we should be using. Is that good enough?

Henry

[1] http://twitter.com/SethRussell/status/14115845285

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/