[foaf-protocols] catchy logo, catchy name

Nathan nathan at webr3.org
Sun May 16 23:15:06 CEST 2010

mike amundsen wrote:
>> WebId seems good enough. It's like OpenId and has the Webbish elelment. I wonder what Seth thinks.
> yep, it's enough. What I mean to say is that, when engaging in
> conversations, "WebId" elicits questions and using the qualifiers I
> offered usually pops a light bulb over people's heads. FWIW, I've also
> used "Authenticed FOAF" and "Authenticated WebId" to get the same
> positive reactions.

did the mrs test (who works online, but isn't geek)

when I say "Authenticated FOAF", or "Authenticated" or "FOAF" she looks 
at me like I just broke wind.

when I say "Web ID" she says, "ooh what's that".

I don't know what that means, but there it is.


More information about the foaf-protocols mailing list