[foaf-protocols] Simple WebID based Resource ACL test

[Nathan]

Story Henry wrote:
> On 19 May 2010, at 19:30, Nathan wrote:
> 
>> For example if you check the headers on:
>>  https://ssl.data.fm/hello
>> you'll see:
>> Link: <https://ssl.data.fm/.wac/friends.n3>; 
>> rel="http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/acl#"; title="Access Control File"
> 
> That can't be the right relation.
> You are using the namespace as a relatin, which well, perhaps not wrong, is not
> dereferenceable, so it is difficult to know what you mean.
> 
> Is there a relation in the acl namespace that would be needed? Please check the ontology first.

Yup, we've discussed this before [1], no property in the acl at the 
minute, would be good to have one, as you previously suggested or as 
acl:acl mentioned on esw wiki [2] - the aforementioned was a temporary 
measure until something better came along.

Unsure if it's wise to set the range to foaf:Document though, anything 
which you can call via HTTP(S) can be subject to wac.. thoughts?

[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/public-lod@w3.org/msg05192.html
[2] http://esw.w3.org/WebAccessControl

Best,

Nathan