[foaf-protocols] Poll on WebID Protocol Ontology Changes
Nathan
nathan at webr3.org
Tue Oct 5 22:27:26 CEST 2010
Nathan wrote:
> Henry Story wrote:
>> On 5 Oct 2010, at 21:47, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>>
>>> I've attempted to add a poll summarizing some of the key topics that
>>> have come up in the last week or so.
>>>
>>> http://doodle.com/6c34uafznhd4adee
>>>
>>> I've added my preferences, perhaps it will give greater clarity if we
>>> could work out where we're in agreement, and where there's room for
>>> discussion?
>> Thanks for putting that together.
>>
>> I voted, but thought I'd like to explain my vote a little bit first, so that it is not
>> misunderstood.
>
> Likewise, and after taking everything in to consideration, I put a MUST
> on both.
>
> Interested to here if somebody can say why both shouldn't be supported?
Sorry, need to clarify - MUST on both for the server, MUST publish one
of the two (which should be self explanatory)
More information about the foaf-protocols
mailing list