[foaf-protocols] WebID Telecon Minutes for 2010-09-07

[Melvin Carvalho]

On 8 September 2010 14:50, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen at openlinksw.com> wrote:

>  On 9/8/10 4:44 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7 September 2010 20:41, Henry Story <henry.story at bblfish.net> wrote:
>
>> Just adding answers.
>>
>> On 7 Sep 2010, at 18:42, Manu Sporny wrote:
>>
>> > Attendees: Stephane Corlosquet, Manu Sporny, Henry Story,
>> > Benjamin Heitmann, Dave Longley, David I. Lehn, and Reto Bachmann-Gmur
>> >
>> > Scribe: Manu Sporny
>> >
>> > Audio logs: http://getwebid.org/meetings/#2010-09-07
>> >
>> > Agenda:
>> >
>> > 1) Multiple URI issue in the SAN extension:
>> >   http://github.com/msporny/webid-spec/issues#issue/2
>>
>>  So the answer was yes on multiple SANs. But we need some language for the
>> spec.
>> A good way is to treat each SAN as a Claimed Identity. Verifying the
>> identity is done
>> using the dereferencing method. All claimed identities can be used to
>> identify the
>> user at the end of the connection.
>>
>>
>> > 2) Selective presentation of WebID-only certificates:
>> >   http://github.com/msporny/webid-spec/issues#issue/3
>>
>>  To investigate in more detail on the mailing list, I need to find the
>> previous threads on the issue.
>>
>> > 3) Shift to Community GitHub account:
>> >   http://github.com/msporny/webid-spec/issues#issue/5
>>
>>  Something that we need to look into. But I think we also need to
>> understand how we function as a group. I would have been happy to have this
>> integrated into the W3C to avoid such issues arising. But as that process is
>> somewhat opaque - it requires a lot of people to agree on something, which
>> is never easy nor predictable.
>>
>> The other option is to look into using a data wiki, using the Tabulator to
>> browse the bugs. I looked at that the other day, and it seemed kind of cool.
>> Perhaps Melvin who used that can tell us how well it works now. The nice
>> thing about that is that we can I think login to that using WebID, which
>> would be a good way to test our work.
>>
>
> Really like this idea.  At the end of the day, having a WebID seems like
> should be a pre requisite for contributing.
>
> However, we can start with github as there's already issues there, and
> migrate over.
>
> I suggest October, as the SWXG final report will be in, and many of us will
> have more time, and also there quite will possibly be a major tabulator
> update.
>
> I'm happy to help set this up.
>
>
> Melvin,
>
> What's with the Tabulator specificity? How about simply requiring the use
> of User Agents that can contribute to a Data Wiki? Tabulator plugin simply
> makes browsers capable of WebID based Data Wiki contributions based on WebID
> ACLs.
>

Fair point.  Any data user agent that can inter operate with a data wiki
should be usable.  I do like the tabulator interface, but if there are
others, that should be fine to use.  In fact, the more the better, that's
what linked data is all about!


>
> The functionality of Tabulator as a Data Wiki editor is functionality that
> other WebID supporters can implement in their products etc..
>
> As you know, I don't like any kind of product or technology specificity
> especially when our goal is interop via common standards etc..
>
>
> Kingsley
>
>
>
>>
>> >
>> > The full text log is here:
>> >
>> > http://getwebid.org/meetings/text/webid-telecon-20100907.txt
>>
>>  I think until the next conference we need to look somewhat more carefully
>> at the flash implementation. It is the one that is linked to from the
>> getwebid.org web site. It seems a bit odd that the only implementation we
>> don't have consensus on, that is not open nor interoperable is the one
>> linked to on the page which is where we are hosting these teleconf calls. It
>> looks slick, but it's a bit misleading.
>>
>> Henry
>>
>> > -- manu
>> >
>> > --
>> > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
>> > President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
>> > blog: WebID - Universal Login for the Web
>> > http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2010/08/07/webid
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > foaf-protocols mailing list
>> > foaf-protocols at lists.foaf-project.org
>> > http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-protocols
>>
>>  Social Web Architect
>> http://bblfish.net/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> foaf-protocols mailing list
>> foaf-protocols at lists.foaf-project.org
>> http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-protocols
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foaf-protocols mailing listfoaf-protocols at lists.foaf-project.orghttp://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-protocols
>
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Kingsley Idehen	
> President & CEO
> OpenLink Software
> Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
> Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen <http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/%7Ekidehen>
> Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foaf-protocols mailing list
> foaf-protocols at lists.foaf-project.org
> http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-protocols
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.foaf-project.org/pipermail/foaf-protocols/attachments/20100908/347c7753/attachment.htm