[foaf-protocols] WebID Protocol / WOT Ontology

Reto Bachmann-Gmür me at farewellutopia.com
Sun Sep 19 16:54:16 CEST 2010


Hi Melvin,

I agrre with you that user -> pub key direction is more intuitive.

However the current spec drafts require cert:identity which is a link from
the public key to the user (and not a cert containing the webid).

Cheers,
reto

On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Melvin Carvalho
<melvincarvalho at gmail.com>wrote:

> Quick question from the other thread.
>
> Should the WebID protocol be able to recognise WOT style public keys [1].
>
> Currently WOT 0.1 has a triple in the style.
>
> User wot:hasKey <PubKey> *
>
> WOT 0.1 is a bit old and we can probably make some tweaks to the syntax in
> view of the WebID protocol.
>
> But the question is:  should we allow a WebID to link to a Public Key as
> part of the WebID protocol (currently there is no such requirement, only
> that a public key links to a cert, which contains a webid)
>
> Personally I find the user -> pub key directional link more intuitive, but
> the current way works too.
>
> [1] http://xmlns.com/wot/0.1/
>
> _______________________________________________
> foaf-protocols mailing list
> foaf-protocols at lists.foaf-project.org
> http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-protocols
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.foaf-project.org/pipermail/foaf-protocols/attachments/20100919/2107e6af/attachment.htm 


More information about the foaf-protocols mailing list