[foaf-protocols] WebID Protocol / WOT Ontology
melvincarvalho at gmail.com
Mon Sep 20 11:08:42 CEST 2010
On 19 September 2010 16:54, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <me at farewellutopia.com>wrote:
> Hi Melvin,
> I agrre with you that user -> pub key direction is more intuitive.
> However the current spec drafts require cert:identity which is a link from
> the public key to the user (and not a cert containing the webid).
Sorry, yes, you are right.
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>> Quick question from the other thread.
>> Should the WebID protocol be able to recognise WOT style public keys .
>> Currently WOT 0.1 has a triple in the style.
>> User wot:hasKey <PubKey> *
>> WOT 0.1 is a bit old and we can probably make some tweaks to the syntax in
>> view of the WebID protocol.
>> But the question is: should we allow a WebID to link to a Public Key as
>> part of the WebID protocol (currently there is no such requirement, only
>> that a public key links to a cert, which contains a webid)
>> Personally I find the user -> pub key directional link more intuitive, but
>> the current way works too.
>>  http://xmlns.com/wot/0.1/
>> foaf-protocols mailing list
>> foaf-protocols at lists.foaf-project.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the foaf-protocols