[foaf-protocols] Vote: public_key, publicKey, hasPublicKey, pubKey
henry.story at gmail.com
Thu Oct 13 14:16:39 CEST 2011
On 13 Oct 2011, at 14:06, Toby Inkster wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:18:59 +0200
> Henry Story <henry.story at gmail.com> wrote:
>> ok. I quite like pubKey. But might people think this had something to
>> do with late night drinking ?
> cert:pubKey, or even just cert:key.
> Checked in support for cert:pubKey to my repo...
Goddamn that's fast!
Ok. Can we then go for just cert:key ? It's shorter and it's probably as much as people need to understand. We could even
have the relation be open as to wether the key is public or private. Of course publishing private keys is not a good idea.
> Toby A Inkster
> <mailto:mail at tobyinkster.co.uk>
Social Web Architect
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 4616 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.foaf-project.org/pipermail/foaf-protocols/attachments/20111013/4d8bec63/attachment.bin
More information about the foaf-protocols