[foaf-protocols] Vote: public_key, publicKey, hasPublicKey, pubKey

[Henry Story]

On 13 Oct 2011, at 14:06, Toby Inkster wrote:

> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:18:59 +0200
> Henry Story <henry.story at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> ok. I quite like pubKey. But might people think this had something to
>> do with late night drinking ?
> 
> cert:pubKey, or even just cert:key.
> 
> Checked in support for cert:pubKey to my repo...
> http://goddamn.co.uk/svn-web/perlmods/revision?rev=977

Goddamn that's fast!

Ok. Can we then go for just cert:key ? It's shorter and it's probably as much as people need to understand. We could even
have the relation be open as to wether the key is public or private. Of course publishing private keys is not a good idea.

Henry

> 
> -- 
> Toby A Inkster
> <mailto:mail at tobyinkster.co.uk>
> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
> 

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4616 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.foaf-project.org/pipermail/foaf-protocols/attachments/20111013/4d8bec63/attachment.bin