[foaf-protocols] Final -- cert:key accepted
henry.story at gmail.com
Fri Oct 14 15:36:45 CEST 2011
On 14 Oct 2011, at 15:30, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
> 2011/10/14 Henry Story <henry.story at gmail.com>:
>> It looks like we have enough implementers and other who like cert:key .
>> I'll replace the cert:public_key with it.
>> When we have a few implementations we can then remove the "unstable" flags.
>> Does someone want to take on the task of rewriting the examples in the
>> spec to use cert:key instead of cert:identity ?
> Is now a good time for other clean up?
> public_exponent -> exponent?
I'd +1 that
> add PrivateKey class?
But perhaps we should do that in another thread. You can start a proposal on public_exponent. And we can vote on that here and discuss it on Monday.
> obvious use case, your protected private key on your local device is
> to be used by a robot to perform tasks for you
> there's also a nice feature with most private keys that they are
> protected by a passphrase ... on the GPG mail list this week, someone
> offered to post his private key in the new york times, he was that
> confident of the strength of his passphrase! :)
>> On 14 Oct 2011, at 14:52, Sergio Fernández wrote:
>> +1 for me as well to cert:key
>> El 13/10/2011 21:05, "Andrei Sambra" <andrei at fcns.eu> escribió:
>>> +1 for me as well. Good, elegant solution.
>>> I can't comment on it too much, but I'm trying to follow this topic.
>>> Dominik Tomaszuk <ddooss at wp.pl> wrote:
>>>> On 13.10.2011 14:41, Henry Story wrote:
>>>>> cert key has my +1 too.
>>>> +1 for key:cert
>>>> Dominik 'domel' Tomaszuk
>> Social Web Architect
>> foaf-protocols mailing list
>> foaf-protocols at lists.foaf-project.org
Social Web Architect
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 4616 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.foaf-project.org/pipermail/foaf-protocols/attachments/20111014/02d316c2/attachment.bin
More information about the foaf-protocols