[foaf-dev] Proposal: :bitcoin
melvincarvalho at gmail.com
Sun Sep 25 17:27:05 CEST 2011
On 23 September 2011 16:00, Dan Brickley <danbri at danbri.org> wrote:
> +Cc: Mike and Rob, from the original foaf:tipjar lunch conversation ~2004 ....
I've made a post on the BTC forum about ontologies.
Also started working with W3C Payments group about getting a proposal
for the bitcoin: URI scheme to IANA ... tho that may take a while.
At this point I think we can assume the BTC address is a string, but
at some point perhaps we should not rule out a URI.
I'll get some comment text after some community feedback ... I do
think foaf : bitcoin would be kind of neat especially in RDFa
And just for run check out the latest innovations! :)
> On 23 September 2011 05:26, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho at gmail.com> wrote:
>> How about a foaf : bitcoin predicate added to the next cut of the vocab
>> Range could be a string
>> Bitcoin is fast becoming one largest payment communities on the net.
>> You can even buy groceries in new york with bitcoins now!
>> A simple predicate could allow easy markup in rdfa for example on
>> blogs, and robots to perform ecommerce. It would also work with all
>> the derivatives namecoin, solidcoin etc.
>> We could use the existing account or tipjar instead, but I think
>> adding the bitcoin predicate could make things that much easier
> Intriguing! I've seen a few pretty harsh critiques (ponzi scheme etc)
> but ultimately it's the choice of the users not vocabulary designers
> what they do with their lives and money. So if it really has got
> substantial traction, then sure, why not?
> So to be clear, the idea is to associate some bitcoin crypto
> gobbledegook with people/agents, such that the ID makes it possible
> for that party to be "paid" via bitcoin?
> Care to draft up some text?
> Rob, Mike -- any thoughts? Is Bitcoin showing up much in the CC and music scene?
More information about the foaf-dev