[foaf-protocols] This message should be signed
henry.story at bblfish.net
Sat Jun 20 10:48:55 CEST 2009
On 20 Jun 2009, at 10:26, Toby Inkster wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 09:14 +0100, Toby Inkster wrote:
>> This message is a test. It should be signed with my FOAF+SSL-enabled
>> X.509 key.
> Hmmm... but wasn't.
I was talking to naxx at the metalabs.at in Vienna about foaf+ssl, and
he was very interested in it for this exact purpose, as he is member
of a group that has produced a pgp encrypted secure mail solution.
Perhaps he has some ideas on how this could help.
> Some SSL error message came up in Evolution when sending it, but it
> didn't give me the chance to stop it sending.
> Oh well, the principle still seems sound. FOAF+SSL could provide us
> a unified trust model for web and e-mail, which is a potential killer
> feature over competing technologies (but not an ov:KillerGorilla).
More information about the foaf-protocols